Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I originally wanted to avoid the need for an option, but git-am > currently depends on the strict sequence number filenames. It is > unclear how difficult it would be to refactor git-am to work with > names that include the extra subject data. I am not sure if I follow. Do you mean $ git am ./dir/0*.txt in a directory where I already have these files $ ls dir/0*.txt dir/0001-Documentation-CodingGuidelines.txt dir/0002-quote-assigned-value.txt dir/0003-t-local-var.txt that have one patch per message does not work?
