Re: [PATCH] t9604: Fix test for musl libc and new Debian

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Well, when I tried to make this change, I first started with Olson
> notation. Then I dig into the mail archive, and I see that we don't
> want to depends on IANA db [5].  Then I switch to POSIX notation but
> I forgot to update that.  I think a PREREQ would work better?
>
> 5: https://lore.kernel.org/git/7v4nlvulc2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Interesting thought to use PREREQ here.  As long as it will avoid
tempting us into testing the feature only where we know that the
feature would work, I am OK with that direction ;-)

Thanks.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux