On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 08:56:56PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/12] git_config_string() considered harmful > [...] > [01/11]: config: make sequencer.c's git_config_string_dup() public > [02/11]: config: add git_config_pathname_dup() > [03/11]: config: prefer git_config_string_dup() for temp variables > [04/11]: config: use git_config_string_dup() for open-coded equivalents > [05/11]: config: use git_config_string_dup() to fix leaky open coding > [06/11]: config: use git_config_string() in easy cases > [07/11]: config: use git_config_pathname_dup() in easy cases > [08/11]: http: use git_config_string_dup() > [09/11]: merge: use git_config_string_dup() for pull strategies > [10/11]: userdiff: use git_config_string_dup() when we can > [11/11]: blame: use "dup" string_list for ignore-revs files The cover letter subject is wrong, of course. :) I wrote it manually and ended up squashing two of the patches at the last minute. -Peff
