Re: reftable & jgit compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:23 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > I think the easiest way to make this happen is if CGit would ship a
> > command to dump a raw reftable in a release soonish. Then JGit could
> > use that command to cross-check that a JGit-written reftable can be
> > read correctly by the CGit code.  By shipping just the dumper you
> > avoid having to wait for proper reftable support to land in git.
>
> You do realize that "proper reftable support" has already landed, right?

I had not realized this, and that's great news!

> So you can just use Git to create a reftable-enabled repository, write
> commits and then use JGit to access the whole repository instead of only
> checking a single table.

For testing, it's probably easier if you can work in terms of
individual tables (because that is where the complexity lies:
different blocksizes, restart frequencies, with index, without index,
with reflog, without reflog etc.), but one can create controlled
individual tables by creating a whole repo and then compacting it.
OTOH, this would necessitate exposing all writer options to the git
CLI, which is maybe a bit much.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwenn@xxxxxxxxx - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux