Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] reftable/stack: use geometric table compaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:12:32PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Justin Tobler via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This is the second version my patch series that refactors the reftable
> > compaction strategy to instead follow a geometric sequence. Changes compared
> > to v1:
> >
> >  * Added GIT_TEST_REFTABLE_NO_AUTOCOMPACTION environment variable to disable
> >    reftable compaction when testing.
> >  * Refactored worktree tests in t0610-reftable-basics.sh to properly assert
> >    git-pack-refs(1) works as expected.
> >  * Added test to validate that alternating table sizes are compacted.
> >  * Added benchmark to compare compaction strategies.
> >  * Moved change that made compaction segment end inclusive to its own
> >    commit.
> >  * Added additional explanation in commits and comments and fixed typos.
> 
> Has anybody took a look at recent failures with this series present
> in 'seen' [*1*] and without [*2*] in osx-reftable jobs for t0610?
> 
> *1* https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/8543205866/job/23406512990
> *2* https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/8543840764/job/23408543876

I noticed that both `seen` and `next` started to fail in the GitLab
mirror today. Unless somebody else beats me to it I'll investigate
tomorrow what causes these.

Patrick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux