Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> This is how such a change may look like. After applying [2/3] and >> [3/3] steps from your series on top of this patch, the updated tests >> in your series (2200 and 7501) seem to still pass. > > This seems perfect. I hope you're OK with me using this patch as a base > for patch [2/3] and [3/3]. :) Yes, as long as you promise to fix typos and grammatical mistakes in my proposed log messages (there are several I just noticed X-<). Thanks.
