Re: [PATCH 1/2] add-patch: introduce 'p' in interactive-patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rubén Justo <rjusto@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Doing nothing here produces, in the current implementation, the intended
> printing.  Maybe the message needs to state so?

Yeah, "/* Nothing special is needed */", or something.

Thanks for a quick response.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux