Dirk Gouders <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> "this means that" could be rephrased in a way a bit more helpful and >> to readers with clarity, perhaps: >> >> Note that our object walk will not perform any better than >> an unfiltered walk with this function, because all reachable >> objects need to be walked in order to ... > > Would it be OK to rearrange it even more? Sure. We are in the business of clarifying this document, so making it easier to read is very much welcomed.
