Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] grep docs: describe --no-index further and improve formatting a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-03-25 20:18, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

+--no-index::
+	Search files in the current directory that is not managed by Git,
+	or by ignoring that the current directory is managed by Git.  This
+	is rather similar to running the regular `grep(1)` utility with its
+	`-r` option specified, but with some additional benefits, such as
+	using multiple worker threads to speed up searches.

Sorry for not mentioning this earlier, but I do not think
multi-threaded grep has to be something we own and others cannot
implement.  A richer pathspec globbing [*1*] and logical operation
on match results may be better examples of "additional benefits" if
we really wanted to mention why people might want to use
"--no-index" in a directory that is outside Git.

No worries.  Furthermore, multi-threaded searches may actually not
be faster for some workloads, or on some systems (the resulting speed
depends heavily on the I/O speed and available CPU power, which not
all systems have plenty of), so I agree that it's better not to mention
it.  I'll send the v3 with adjusted wording.

[Footnote]

 *1* When you want to look for something in files whose name begins
     with "g" but does not have "rc" in it, you'd do

     $ git grep --no-index -c . ':(exclude)*rc*' 'g*'

 --threads <num>::
-	Number of grep worker threads to use.
-	See `grep.threads` in 'CONFIGURATION' for more information.
+	Number of `grep` worker threads to use, to speed up searches.
+	See 'NOTES ON THREADS' and `grep.threads` in 'CONFIGURATION'
+	for more information.

I actually do not think adding ", to speed up searches" is an
improvement.  But referring to NOTES ON THREADS is a good idea, and
by reading that NOTES ON THREADS section, readers can tell why it
sometimes does not speed things up or even slow them down.

Agreed, as noted above.  Will be adjusted in the v3.

Other than that, looking great.

Nice, that makes me happy. :)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux