"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> be, as that is better for the world". But I am OK to add less secure >> thing as long as it is an opt-in "easy way out". > > ... Thus, my goal is to make it _possible_ > for people to implement this, but it to make it their responsibility (or > that of a suitable open source project) to do so instead of asking me to > maintain it. That, I think, is a fair and equitable tradeoff for this > situation. Yup, I think we are in agreement. I have no problem with giving them a long rope ;-)
