Re: [PATCH] Reuse previous annotation when overwriting a tag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 12:36:36PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Mike Hommey wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:54:38AM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > > Why not teach write_annotations() (or write_tag_body() like I would prefer 
> > > it to be called) to grok a null_sha1?  It's not like we care for 
> > > performance here, but rather for readability and ease of use.
> > 
> > By the way, I think it would be much better if this function was made
> > more generic and would not write, but return an strbuf containing the
> > object body. It could also be used by e.g. git-commit --amend.
> > 
> > What would be the best suited place for such a function ?
> 
> editor.c, I'd say.

On which topic is this ?

Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux