On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:05:41AM +0100, eugenio gigante wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:51:52 +0100 Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > We also have consider that there may be alternate implementations of Git > > that would only know to handle the old layout. Those tools would be > > broken in case we did such a migration, but they would be broken anyway > > if the bisect was started via Git and not via the tool. > > The first implementations that come to my mind are Jgit and libgit2. > I took a look at these two and apparently there is no support for git-bisect. > Maybe you are not referring to those. I'm basically referring to everything that has wider use out there and that knows to access Git repositories. I don't know about all the implementations out there and whether they do or don't support bisections. If they don't then this is great, because it makes it a ton easier for us to argue why the proposed refactoring is okay to do. > Also, do we care about several GUIs for git? Many users do use graphical frontends, so we likely should investigate how they'd behave, yes. Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
