On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 5:12 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Peff felt that adding `git config --show-hostname-for-includes` was > > probably overkill, but I'd argue that it is necessary to enable users > > to deterministically figure out the value to use in their > > configuration rather than having to grope around in the dark via > > guesswork and trial-and-error to figure out exactly what works. > > > > And the option name doesn't necessarily have to be so verbose; a > > shorter name, such as `git config --show-hostname` may be good enough. > > Implementing this option would also obviate the need to implement > > `test-tool xgethostname` (though, I agree with Junio that `test-tool > > gethostname` would have been a better, less implementation-revealing > > name). > > Yeah, I like that show-hostname thing (which I do not know if "config" > is a good home for, though). The other possibility which came to mind was adding a GIT_HOSTNAME variable to the output of `git var -l`.
