If we get an unexpected result, the prio-queue unit test reports it like
this:
# check "result[j++] == show(get)" failed at t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c:43
# left: 5
# right: 1
# failed at result[] index 0
That last line repeats "failed" and "result" from the first line.
Shorten it to resemble a similar one in t-ctype and also remove the
incrementation from the first line to avoid possible distractions from
the message of which comparison went wrong where:
# check "result[j] == show(get)" failed at t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c:43
# left: 5
# right: 1
# j: 0
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@xxxxxx>
---
t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c b/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c
index d78b002f9e..616d0fc86f 100644
--- a/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c
+++ b/t/unit-tests/t-prio-queue.c
@@ -31,16 +31,18 @@ static void test_prio_queue(int *input, int *result, size_t input_size)
get = prio_queue_get(&pq);
if (!check(peek == get))
return;
- if(!check_int(result[j++], ==, show(get)))
- test_msg("failed at result[] index %d", j-1);
+ if (!check_int(result[j], ==, show(get)))
+ test_msg(" j: %d", j);
+ j++;
break;
case DUMP:
while ((peek = prio_queue_peek(&pq))) {
get = prio_queue_get(&pq);
if (!check(peek == get))
return;
- if(!check_int(result[j++], ==, show(get)))
- test_msg("failed at result[] index %d", j-1);
+ if (!check_int(result[j], ==, show(get)))
+ test_msg(" j: %d", j);
+ j++;
}
break;
case STACK:
--
2.44.0
