On 2024-03-12 at 07:45:13, Jeff King wrote: > So I guess my question was more of: are we thinking this explicit > algorithm thing is coming very soon? If so, it might be worth keeping it > in the docs. But if not, and it's just a hypothetical future, it may be > better to clean things up now. And I ask you as the person who mostly > juggles possible future algorithm plans in his head. ;) Of course if the > answer is some combination of "I don't really remember what the plan > was" and "I don't have time to work on it anytime soon" that's OK, too. The answer is that I'm not planning on doing the SHA-1/SHA-256 interop work except as part of my employment, since I'm kinda out of energy in that area and it's a lot of work, and I don't believe that my employer is planning to have me do that anytime soon. Thus, if nobody else is planning on doing it in short order, it probably won't be getting done. I know Eric was working on some of the interop work, so perhaps he can speak to whether he's planning on working in this area soonish. -- brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him) Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
