On 2024-03-13 19:24, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Osipov, Michael (IN IT IN)" <michael.osipov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
An oversight or bug?
Neither, i.e. WAI, I would say.
The configuration variable log.date is about "git log" and its
documentation makes no promises how "git bisect" may or may not be
affected.
Having said that, I think it is not unreasonable for you to make it
a feature request to add bisect.dateformat or whatever. The only
interesting part from the output being the exact commit object name
the problem bisects to, I personally would not see it a high priority
feature request, though.
Interesting thought, but that also means that "git show" misbehaves
because it respects "log.date" and there is no "show.date". I still
think that consistency shouldn't be obeyed.
I'd be happy if someone could consider this improvement.
Michael
