phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx writes: >> +Note that this option specifies how to handle a commit that was not initially >> +empty, but rather became empty due to a previous commit. Commits that were >> +initially empty will cause the cherry-pick to fail. To force the inclusion of >> +those commits, use `--allow-empty`. > > I found this last paragraph is slightly confusing now --empty=keep > implies --allow-empty. Maybe we could change the middle sentence to > say something like > > With the exception of `--empty=keep` commits that were initially > empty will cause the cherry-pick to fail. That is certainly easier to read and much less confusing. Thanks, both.
