Re: [PATCH 0/2] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects (follow-up)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects (follow-up)
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 09:56:55 -0800
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>, Dirk Gouders <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CABPp-BFKciBPN0WAaGaK4tb8hXit22Up4LMoJNxo-+DqEspD+A@mail.gmail.com> (Elijah Newren's message of "Sat, 9 Mar 2024 08:51:48 -0800")
References: <pull.1686.git.1709993397.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> <CABPp-BFKciBPN0WAaGaK4tb8hXit22Up4LMoJNxo-+DqEspD+A@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> This is a follow-up for
>> https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1657.v4.git.1709113457.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/,
>> based on the js/merge-base-with-missing-commit branch.
>
> This series looks good to me; thanks.

Thanks, both.

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects (follow-up)
  - From: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects (follow-up)
  - From: Elijah Newren

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] merge-ort/merge-recursive: do report errors in `merge_submodule()`
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sequencer: allow disabling conflict advice
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects (follow-up)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] The merge-base logic vs missing commit objects (follow-up)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux