Re: [PATCH] git-rev-list.txt: rev stands for revision, not reverse.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> writes:

> Hello Junio,
>
> * Junio C Hamano wrote on Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 08:51:11PM CET:
>> Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@xxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > Yes, believe it or not, but I stumbled over the synopsis
>> >
>> > | git-rev-list - Lists commit objects in reverse chronological order
>> >
>> > asking myself whether rev could possibly mean "reverse".
>> > I hope this helps avoid this pitfall for others.
>> 
>> In addition to your patch,
>> 
>> 	git-rev-list - List commits from most recent to older
>> 
>> might be a good rewording?
>
> Is the reverse chronological order the primary sorting key at all?

It is mostly chrono but there is a topo element as well.  You
would never see a parent none of whose child is shown.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux