Re: [PATCH 4/4] trace2: remove unneeded calls to generate 'def_param' set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 2024.03.04 15:40, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> From: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhostetler@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Now that "trace2_cmd_name()" implicitly calls "trace2_cmd_list_config()"
>> and "trace2_cmd_list_env_vars()", we don't need to explicitly call them.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhostetler@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  git.c | 6 ------
>>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/git.c b/git.c
>> index 7068a184b0a..a769d72ab8f 100644
>> --- a/git.c
>> +++ b/git.c
>> @@ -373,8 +373,6 @@ static int handle_alias(int *argcp, const char ***argv)
>>  			strvec_pushv(&child.args, (*argv) + 1);
>>  
>>  			trace2_cmd_alias(alias_command, child.args.v);
>> -			trace2_cmd_list_config();
>> -			trace2_cmd_list_env_vars();
>>  			trace2_cmd_name("_run_shell_alias_");
>>  
>>  			ret = run_command(&child);
>> @@ -411,8 +409,6 @@ static int handle_alias(int *argcp, const char ***argv)
>>  		COPY_ARRAY(new_argv + count, *argv + 1, *argcp);
>>  
>>  		trace2_cmd_alias(alias_command, new_argv);
>> -		trace2_cmd_list_config();
>> -		trace2_cmd_list_env_vars();
>>  
>>  		*argv = new_argv;
>>  		*argcp += count - 1;
>> @@ -462,8 +458,6 @@ static int run_builtin(struct cmd_struct *p, int argc, const char **argv)
>>  
>>  	trace_argv_printf(argv, "trace: built-in: git");
>>  	trace2_cmd_name(p->cmd);
>> -	trace2_cmd_list_config();
>> -	trace2_cmd_list_env_vars();
>>  
>>  	validate_cache_entries(the_repository->index);
>>  	status = p->fn(argc, argv, prefix);
>> -- 
>> gitgitgadget
>> 
>
> I'd personally prefer to see this squashed into Patch 3, but I don't
> feel too strongly about it. Either way, the series LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx>

Let's see what JeffH says about this.  I agree with you that making
some stuff redundant in [Patch 3/4] and fixing the redundancy in
this step does feel somewhat roundabout way of doing this.

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux