Todd Zullinger <tmz@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Isn't -E a GNUism? > ... > https://www.austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=528 suggests > that -E has been adopted Then that is OK. Thanks for a good news. > and, importanly, is more widely > supported than -r (if we were considering using that rather > than rewriting this to not use ERE syntax). At least I wasn't, so it is irrelevant to this review, but it still is nice to know about it [*]. Thanks. [Footnote] * or is the knowledge of '-r' itself also irrelevant, now '-E' is kosher and widely usable?
