Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@xxxxxxx> writes: > Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@xxxxxxx> > --- > git-instaweb.sh | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > On IRC yesterday, two were asking for this and it seems simply enough. > Apparently, git-instaweb is a great way to see if you've set up a > remote repository correctly. > > diff --git a/git-instaweb.sh b/git-instaweb.sh > index 95c3e5a..14917ac 100755 > --- a/git-instaweb.sh > +++ b/git-instaweb.sh > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ USAGE='[--start] [--stop] [--restart] > [--local] [--httpd=<httpd>] [--port=<port>] [--browser=<browser>] > [--module-path=<path> (for Apache2 only)]' > > +SUBDIRECTORY_OK=Yes > . git-sh-setup > > fqgitdir="$GIT_DIR" I'd agree with the goal of the patch, and I would not doubt the patch worked for you, but it somewhat feels wrong that you can say "It is Ok to run this script from a subdirectory" and that is the magic to allow something to work in a bare repository. Care to share your insights on what is going on? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html