"Ghanshyam Thakkar" <shyamthakkar001@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes, in the previous testcase we determined that template cannot set > core.bare. Therefore, this testcase would be like testing > --bare/--no-bare option, which is already done in 0001-init.sh and > t5601-clone.sh. However, I don't have strong opinion on this. I can add > it back if you think it is worth it. I was merely trying to make sure that I understood your motivation behind the change, which was described at the end of the commit log message, i.e. "... and remove one redundant testcase.". Thanks.
