On 2024.01.19 14:46, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Josh Steadmon <steadmon@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > @@ -762,7 +763,7 @@ fuzz-objs: $(FUZZ_OBJS) > > # Always build fuzz objects even if not testing, to prevent bit-rot. > > all:: $(FUZZ_OBJS) > > So, this is what you referred to in your proposed log message. We > do build objects to prevent bit-rot, but we do not link, so it is > merely half a protection. > > > ... > > fuzz-all: $(FUZZ_PROGRAMS) > > But there is this target. I wonder if it makes it even better to > update the "always build fuzz objects" one? Given that some folks > may not have the necessary clang toochain for linking, it may > probably be a bit too much, perhaps? Indeed, this would have caught the previous common-main issue. I'll send a followup to fix this, thanks for the suggestion!
