Re: [PATCH] test-lib-functions: simplify `test_file_not_empty` failure message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:11 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <ericsunshine@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > A more accurate message might be "'foo' is empty but
> > should not be (or doesn't exist)", but that's unnecessarily long-winded
> > and adds little information that the test author couldn't discover by
> > noticing the file's absence.
>
> The "adds little information" version may be
>
>                 echo "'$1' is either missing or empty, but should not be"
>
> And avoiding "X is Y, but should  be ~Y" construct, perhaps
>
>                 echo "'$1' should be a file with non-empty contents"
>
> would work better?  I dunno.

I find "'$1' is either missing or empty, but should not be" suggestion
clear and easily understood. I'll reroll with that.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux