Re: [PATCH] clean: improve -n and -f implementation and documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Getting rid of "config_set", which was an extra variable that kept
> track of where "force" came from, does make the logic cleaner, I
> guess.  What we want to happen is that one of -i/-n/-f is required
> when clean.requireForce is *not* unset (i.e. 0 <= require_force).

Oh, noes.  require_force is unset explicitly it would be 0, so this
should have read (i.e. require_force != 0).  Sorry for a thinko.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux