Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The double-negative confused me even when suggesting a replacement. > What I meant was that a better phrasing would perhaps have been: > > 'foo' is empty but should not be +1. Thanks for caring.
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The double-negative confused me even when suggesting a replacement. > What I meant was that a better phrasing would perhaps have been: > > 'foo' is empty but should not be +1. Thanks for caring.
|