Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Implement `git log --merge` also for rebase/cherry-pick/revert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Philippe

On 28/02/2024 13:54, Philippe Blain wrote:
Range-diff versus v5:

1:  c9536431d1 ! 1:  363657561c revision: ensure MERGE_HEAD is a ref in prepare_show_merge
     @@ Commit message
          (2) obtain the oid without any prefixing by refs.c:repo_dwim_ref()
          (3) error out when MERGE_HEAD is a symref.
+ Note that we avoid marking the new error message for translation as it
     +    will be done in the next commit when the message is generalized to other
     +    special refs.

Looking at the change below, the new message is in fact marked for translation. I don't think this matters (other than the commit message being confusing) as the translators will only see the final version of the massage.

          Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
          Signed-off-by: Michael Lohmann <mi.al.lohmann@xxxxxxxxx>
          Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
     @@ revision.c: static void prepare_show_merge(struct rev_info *revs)
      +			&oid, NULL))
       		die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD?");
      +	if (is_null_oid(&oid))
     -+		die(_("MERGE_HEAD is a symbolic ref?"));
     ++		die(_("MERGE_HEAD exists but is a symbolic ref"));

The new message is marked with _(...) so will be translated.

       	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "MERGE_HEAD");
       	add_pending_object(revs, &head->object, "HEAD");
       	add_pending_object(revs, &other->object, "MERGE_HEAD");
2:  1641c4be81 ! 2:  749abadc04 revision: implement `git log --merge` also for rebase/cherry-pick/revert
     @@ revision.c: static void add_pending_commit_list(struct rev_info *revs,
      +				RESOLVE_REF_READING | RESOLVE_REF_NO_RECURSE,
      +				oid, NULL)) {
      +			if (is_null_oid(oid))
     -+				die(_("%s is a symbolic ref?"), other_head[i]);
     ++				die(_("%s exists but is a symbolic ref"), other_head[i]);

The second patch updates the message and this new version retains the _(...)

Best Wishes

Phillip

      +			return other_head[i];
      +		}
      +
     @@ revision.c: static void prepare_show_merge(struct rev_info *revs)
      -			&oid, NULL))
      -		die("--merge without MERGE_HEAD?");
      -	if (is_null_oid(&oid))
     --		die(_("MERGE_HEAD is a symbolic ref?"));
     +-		die(_("MERGE_HEAD exists but is a symbolic ref"));
      -	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, "MERGE_HEAD");
      +	other_name = lookup_other_head(&oid);
      +	other = lookup_commit_or_die(&oid, other_name);





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux