Re: [PATCH 2/3] get_oid_basic(): special-case ref@{n} for oldest reflog entry

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> the reflog entry we found. Instead, let's put the special case into the
> caller that resolves @{n}, as it cares only about the oid.

Thanks.  I am quite puzzled why we didn't do this obvious thing from
the start.

> There is one complication, though. When read_ref_at() hits a truncated
> reflog, it will return the "old" value of the oldest entry only if it is
> not the null oid. Otherwise, it actually returns the "new" value from
> that entry! This bit of fudging is due to d1a4489a56 (avoid null SHA1 in
> oldest reflog, 2008-07-08), where asking for "ref@{20.years.ago}" for a
> ref created recently will produce the initial value as a convenience
> (even though technically it did not exist 20 years ago).
>
> But this convenience is only useful for time-based cutoffs. For
> count-based cutoffs, get_oid_basic() has always simply complained about
> going too far back:
>
>   $ git rev-parse HEAD@{20}
>   fatal: log for 'HEAD' only has 16 entries
>
> and we should continue to do so, rather than returning a nonsense value
> (there's even a test in t1508 already which covers this). So let's have
> the d1a4489a56 code kick in only when doing timestamp-based cutoffs.

Makes perfect sense.

> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  object-name.c              | 9 +++++++++
>  refs.c                     | 2 +-
>  t/t1508-at-combinations.sh | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux