On 18-feb-2024 21:38:54, Dragan Simic wrote: > Regarding the branch copy and rename operations and their argument > names, perhaps the following would be a good choice: > > --copy [<branch>] <destination> > --move [<branch>] <destination> > > It would clearly reflect the nature of the performed operations, while > still using "<branch>" consistently, this time to refer to the source > branch. Using "<destination>" to select the destination name should > be pretty much self-descriptive, if you agree. Sorry, but I don't. Actually, I don't see the logic with <destination>. I appreciate your efforts to provide consistency, but the current ones seem better options to me: either <oldbranch> and <newbranch>, or the shortened ones: <old> and <new>. Thanks.
