Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > How does "stash.keepIndex" interact with "git rebase --autostash" and > "git merge --autostash"? I think both those commands expect a clean > index after running "git stash". They could just override the config > setting but it might get a bit confusing if some commands respect the > config and others don't. The "autostash" feature fundamentally should not respect such configuration variables, as the reason why they exist is not to create a stash of any unusual kind the user expresses preference to by the configuration variable(s), but to clear the slate and bring both the working tree and the index pristine with respect to HEAD. Also, when able, they would automatically unstash after the main operation to rebase or merge is done, right? IOW, normally the use of the stash ought to be invisible to the end users. I would not worry too much about the "confusion" factor for these reasons. You are however right that this will confuse the toolchain. These two commands we provide may not be affected (or we can make them not affected by changing their implementation if needed, while we add such configuration variables at the same time), but third-party tools and end-user scripts that has trusted that when they write "git stash", the command will give them a clean index and working tree will be broken big time. So, I am somewhat negative on the patch in the current form, until I see how the plan to help third-party tools and end-user scripts that rely on the promise we have given them looks like. Thanks.
