Hi, On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Teng Long wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote on Mon, 05 Feb 2024: > > Hi, when I do zh_CN l10n work for 2.44, I found some check changes like: > > die(_("unable to read tree %s") > > in patchset, some old code for this like work is similar but with parentheses > surrounded with the OID parameter: > > die(_("unable to read tree (%s)") FWIW I copied the error message from https://github.com/git/git/blob/v2.43.0/tree-walk.c#L103, but only now realized that it is untranslated. > I think it's really a small nit, I don't think it's a requirement to immediately > optimize, they're just some small printing consistency formatting issues, so make > some small tips here. Thank you for paying attention. I agree that it would be good to make Git's error messages consistent, even if I sadly won't be able to focus on that due to changes at my dayjob. Ciao, Johannes