Re: [PATCH] branch: rework the descriptions of rename and copy operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Ruben and Junio,

On 2024-02-15 22:52, Rubén Justo wrote:
On 15-feb-2024 19:42:32, Dragan Simic wrote:

Move the descriptions of the <oldbranch> and <newbranch> arguments to the descriptions of the branch rename and copy operations, where they naturally
belong.

Thank you Dragan for working on this.

Thank you, and everyone else, for the reviews and suggestions.

Let me chime in just to say that maybe another terms could be considered here; like: "<branchname>" and "<newbranchname>" (maybe too long...) or
so.

I have no problem with the current terms, but "<branchname>" can be a
sensible choice here as it is already being used for other commands
where, and this may help overall, the consideration: "if ommited, the
current branch is considered" also applies.

Actually, I'd agree with Junio's reply that suggested using even
shorter terms.  Just like "<oldbranch>" and "<newbranch>" can safely
be shortened to "<old>" and "<new>", respectively, "<branchname>"
can also be shortened to "<name>".

It's all about the context, which is improved by moving the descriptions
of the arguments closer to the descriptions of the commands.

Though, I'd prefer that we keep "<oldbranch>" and "<newbranch>" (and
"<branchname>") for now, for the sake of consistency, and I'd get them
shortened in the future patches.

Also, improve the descriptions of these two branch operations and,
for completeness, describe the outcomes of forced operations.

Describing the arguments together with their respective operations, instead of describing them separately in a rather unfortunate attempt to squeeze more meaning out of fewer words, flows much better and makes the git-branch(1)
man page significantly more usable.

The subsequent improvements shall continue this approach by either dissolving as many sentences from the "Description" section into the "Options" section, or by having those sentences converted into some kind of more readable and
better flowing prose, as already discussed and outlined. [1][2]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqttmmlahf.fsf@gitster.g/T/#u
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqq8r4zln08.fsf@gitster.g/T/#u

Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Notes:
This patch was originally named "branch: clarify <oldbranch> and <newbranch> terms further", submitted and discussed in another thread, [3] but the nature of the patch has changed, causing the patch subject to be adjusted to match.

Consequently, this is effectively version 2 of the patch, which includes detailed feedback from Kyle and Junio, who suggested moving/adding the argument descriptions to their respective commands. This resulted in more significant changes to the contents of the git-branch(1) man page, in an
    attempt to make it more readable.

[3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/e2eb777bca8ffeec42bdd684837d28dd52cfc9c3.1707136999.git.dsimic@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Documentation/git-branch.txt | 44 +++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/git-branch.txt b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
index 0b0844293235..370ea43c0380 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-branch.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-branch.txt
@@ -72,16 +72,6 @@ the remote-tracking branch. This behavior may be changed via the global
 overridden by using the `--track` and `--no-track` options, and
 changed later using `git branch --set-upstream-to`.

-With a `-m` or `-M` option, <oldbranch> will be renamed to <newbranch>.
-If <oldbranch> had a corresponding reflog, it is renamed to match
-<newbranch>, and a reflog entry is created to remember the branch
-renaming. If <newbranch> exists, -M must be used to force the rename
-to happen.
-
-The `-c` and `-C` options have the exact same semantics as `-m` and
-`-M`, except instead of the branch being renamed, it will be copied to a
-new name, along with its config and reflog.
-
 With a `-d` or `-D` option, `<branchname>` will be deleted.  You may
 specify more than one branch for deletion.  If the branch currently
 has a reflog then the reflog will also be deleted.
@@ -128,18 +118,28 @@ Note that 'git branch -f <branchname> [<start-point>]', even with '-f', refuses to change an existing branch `<branchname>` that is checked out
 in another worktree linked to the same repository.

--m::
---move::
-	Move/rename a branch, together with its config and reflog.
+-m [<oldbranch>] <newbranch>::
+--move [<oldbranch>] <newbranch>::
+ Rename an existing branch <oldbranch>, which if not specified defaults
+	to the current branch, to <newbranch>.  The configuration variables
+ for the <oldbranch> branch and its reflog are also renamed appropriately
+	to be used with <newbranch>.  Renaming fails if branch <newbranch>
+ already exists, but you can use `-M` or `--move --force` to overwrite
+	the files in existing branch <newbranch> while renaming.

--M::
+-M [<oldbranch>] <newbranch>::
 	Shortcut for `--move --force`.

--c::
---copy::
-	Copy a branch, together with its config and reflog.
+-c [<oldbranch>] <newbranch>::
+--copy [<oldbranch>] <newbranch>::
+	Copy an existing branch <oldbranch>, which if not specified defaults
+	to the current branch, to <newbranch>.  The configuration variables
+ for the <oldbranch> branch and its reflog are also copied appropriately
+	to be used with <newbranch>.  Copying fails if branch <newbranch>
+ already exists, but you can use `-C` or `--copy --force` to overwrite
+	the files in existing branch <newbranch> while copying.

--C::
+-C [<oldbranch>] <newbranch>::
 	Shortcut for `--copy --force`.

 --color[=<when>]::
@@ -311,14 +311,6 @@ superproject's "origin/main", but tracks the submodule's "origin/main".
 	given as a branch name, a commit-id, or a tag.  If this
 	option is omitted, the current HEAD will be used instead.

-<oldbranch>::
-	The name of an existing branch.  If this option is omitted,
-	the name of the current branch will be used instead.
-
-<newbranch>::
-	The new name for an existing branch. The same restrictions as for
-	<branchname> apply.
-
 --sort=<key>::
 	Sort based on the key given. Prefix `-` to sort in descending
 	order of the value. You may use the --sort=<key> option




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux