On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 1:11 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:12 AM Linus Arver via GitGitGadget > > <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> This patch series is the first 10 patches of a larger cleanup/bugfix series > >> (henceforth "larger series") I've been working on. > > > > There are now 28 patches in this series. > > > > I took a look at all of them, and I think that this series should be > > split into 4 or more series. > > I presume that [01-09/28] would be the first part, nothing > controversial and consisting of obvious clean-ups? I do not mind > merging that part down to remove the future review load if everybody > agrees. Yeah, patches [01-09/28] look good to me. If we are merging them without the rest, we might want to change a bit the last sentence in 09/28 which says: "In the next patch, we'll change format_trailer_info() to use the parsed trailer_item objects instead of the string array." Maybe just: s/In the next patch/In a future patch/
