Re: Interactive rebase: using "pick" for merge commits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Patrick and Stefan

On 12/02/2024 07:15, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:23:16AM +0100, Stefan Haller wrote:
On 09.02.24 17:24, Phillip Wood wrote:
Yes, I'm familiar with all this, but that's not what I mean. I don't
want to maintain the topology here, and I'm also not suggesting that git
itself generates such "pick" entries with -mX arguments (maybe I wasn't
clear on that). What I want to do is to add such entries myself, as a
user, resulting in the equivalent of doing a "break" at that point in
the rebase and doing a "git cherry-pick -mX <hash-of-merge-commit>"
manually.

It would be neat indeed if this could be specified in the instruction
sheet. We already support options for the "merge" instruction, so
extending "pick" to support options isn't that far-fetched. Then it
would become possible to say "pick -m1 fa1afe1".

It would certainly be possible to extend the sequencer to do that but I'm not familiar with why people use "git cherry-pick -m" [1] so I'm wondering what this would be used for. It would involve a bit of extra complexity so I think we'd want a compelling reason as to why cherry-picking merges without maintaining the topology is useful especially as one can currently do that via "exec git cherry-pick -m ..."

Best Wishes

Phillip

[1] I did a quick web search and the results all seemed to focus on how to do it rather than why you'd want to.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux