Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> on Fri, 2024/02/09 14:54: > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Christian Hesse <list@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >> From: Christian Hesse <mail@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> We had this fixed in 3307f7dde2ae8f5281d0782f7291a073c9b1cdc2, > >> and it broke again in eea0e59ffbed6e33d171ace5be13cde9faa41639. > > > > Thanks, already reported and fixed, I believe? > > Oops, missing link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/pull.1664.git.git.1706833113569.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ Sorry, missed that... Probably because the breakage went into 2.43.1, but the upstream fix did not. So sorry for the noise. Anyway... does it make sense to move the include into the condition? -- main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=0;b=c[a++];) putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);}
Attachment:
pgpfTOA72GK81.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
