On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 07:32:50PM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote: > Hi Patrick amd Christian, > > > On 6 February 2024 1:43:02 pm IST, Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 6:51 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 12:25:31AM +0530, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote: > > > >> I don't quite mind either way. I think overall we have enough tests that > >> can be converted even if both projects got picked up separately. And the > >> reftable unit tests are a bit more involved than the other tests given > >> that their coding style doesn't fit at all into the Git project. So it's > >> not like they can just be copied over, they definitely need some special > >> care. > >> > >> Also, the technical complexity of the "reftable" backend is rather high, > >> which is another hurdle to take. > >> > >> Which overall makes me lean more towards keeping this as a separate > >> project now that I think about it. > > Makes sense. I suppose we need to capture the distinction more > clearly in the ideas page. > > I've tweaked the doc for the same. Do check it out and feel free to > suggest any corrections. > > Ideas page: https://git.github.io/SoC-2024-Ideas/ Yeah, the clarification looks good to me. Thanks! Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
