Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This addresses all of the known test failures from v1 of this set of >> changes. In particular I have reworked commit_tree_extended which >> was flagged by smatch, -Werror=array-bounds, and the leak detector. >> >> One functional bug was fixed in repo_for_each_abbrev where it was >> mistakenly displaying too many ambiguous oids. >> >> I am posting this so that people review and testing of this patchset >> won't be distracted by the known and fixed issues. > > We haven't seen any reviews on this second round, and have had it > outside 'next' for too long. I am tempted to say that we merge it > to 'next' and see if anybody screams at this point. FWIW out of all the "Needs review" topics this one seemed like the most deserving of another pair of eyes, and I was planning to review some of the patches here this week + the weekend. If my review takes too long (taking longer than this weekend) I can give another update next week saying "too hard for me, please don't wait for me" to unblock you from merging to next. Thanks.
