Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this 
> >>> patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced 
> >>> me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead?
> >>
> >> Isn't that obvious?  To prevent you from accidentally losing a commit.
> >
> > In case it is not obvious...
> >
> > A rebase conflict resolution that results in emptiness is a
> > rather rare event (especially because rebase drops upfront the
> > identical changes from the set of commits to be replayed), but
> > it does happen.
> 
> Funny how 2 of my first 3 commits suffer from this "rather rare event",
> and it was not Friday, 13 ;)

They are rare events.  In your case I guess that subtly different versions 
were _actually_ applied (such as white space fixes), which is why such a 
rare event hit you.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux