Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > this is the second version of my patch series that introduces the > reftable backend. > > This version addresses the feedback by Karthik. I don't think it really > makes sense to spell out every change here -- the range diff should > likely be easier to digest. This, when merged to 'seen' (which also has "for-each-ref now thinks an empty string is a signal to show ref-like things outside the refs/ hierarchy" topic, kn/for-all-refs), seems to break *-reftable CI tests, cf. https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/7765401528 I'll tentatively eject the topic from 'seen', even though I have a suspicion that it byitself would pass all the tests. Thanks.
