Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] add-patch: classify '@' as a synonym for 'HEAD'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> You decided to use is_rev_head() instead of user_meant_head(), so
> you'd need to update the above description to match, I think.

Having said this, I have a slight fear that normal users would
expect is_rev_head(X) to say "yes" for "master" when the current
branch is "master", though.  is_head(X) would have the same
downside.







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux