Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 10:15:40PM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > >> The patches fixes two small hiccups I found with the unit-tests. Neither >> is a show-stopper, but mostly just small quality-of-life fixes. > > And here's another iteration based on the feedback from v1. It uses the > mkdir_p template mentioned by Gábor, fixes the $(X) issue mentioned by > Patrick, and adds a new patch to handle the directory in "make clean". > > No range diff, as range-diff refuses to admit that the patches are > related (presumably because even though the changes are small, the > original patches were also tiny). > > [1/3]: Makefile: use mkdir_p_parent_template for UNIT_TEST_BIN > [2/3]: Makefile: remove UNIT_TEST_BIN directory with "make clean" > [3/3]: t/Makefile: get UNIT_TESTS list from C sources Merging this topic seems to stop all "win test (n)" jobs at GitHub CI, which is puzzling (I would have understood a broken build, but that is not what we are seeing). https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/7748054008 is a run of 'next' that is broken. https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/7748547579 is a run of 'seen~1' with this topic reverted (the ps/reftable-backend topic is excluded), which seems to pass. Does it ring a bell, anybody? Thanks.
