Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ..., if that gives us a readable set of bite-sized changes that > prepare a solid foundation to rebuild things on top. I am having a > feeling that not even a single person has reviewed them on list even > though we are already at the third iteration, which is quite > frustrating (and I would imagine that it would be frustrating for > you, too), ... I guess "not even a single person" was a bit unfair, given that we did see some minor comments from me and also Josh during the first round. But neither of two rounds saw any in-depth reviews that question "is the code doing the right thing?", which would take a real reading of and a comparison between the code before and after the patches, with some understanding of how things have been working, how things were envisioned to evolve, and how the patch author would want to change the course of the evolution of the code in the longer term. Christian, you've been touching the code in this area the longuest. Can we have some of your time reviewing these? Thanks.
