Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > I'm always a bit hesitant to add trailers referring to off-list reviews > to commits. It's impossible for a future reader to discover how that > trailer came to be by just using the mailing list archive, and expecting > them to use third-party services to verify them feels wrong to me. > > It's part of the reason why I'm pushing more into the direction of > on-list reviews at GitLab. It makes it a lot more obvious how such a > Reviewed-by came to be and keeps things self-contained on the mailing > list. It also grows new contributors who are becoming more familiar with > how the Git mailing list works. If such a review already happened > internally due to whatever reason then I think it ought to be fine for > that reviewer to chime in saying that they have already reviewed the > patch series and that things look good to them. Thanks. That would improve clarifying a situation like this one (eh, actually, once it is done this particular situation wouldn't need any clarification).