Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sergei Organov wrote: > >> Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this >> patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced >> me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead? > > Isn't that obvious? To prevent you from accidentally losing a commit. The commit would not change anything, so what is there to lose? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
