[PATCH 1/5] reftable/reader: be more careful about errors in indexed seeks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



When doing an indexed seek we first need to do a linear seek in order to
find the index block for our wanted key. We do not check the returned
error of the linear seek though. This is likely not an issue because the
next call to `table_iter_next()` would return error, too. But it very
much is a code smell when an error variable is being assigned to without
actually checking it.

Safeguard the code by checking for errors.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx>
---
 reftable/reader.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/reftable/reader.c b/reftable/reader.c
index 64dc366fb1..278f727a3d 100644
--- a/reftable/reader.c
+++ b/reftable/reader.c
@@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ static int reader_seek_indexed(struct reftable_reader *r,
 		goto done;
 
 	err = reader_seek_linear(&index_iter, &want_index);
+	if (err < 0)
+		goto done;
+
 	while (1) {
 		err = table_iter_next(&index_iter, &index_result);
 		table_iter_block_done(&index_iter);
-- 
2.43.GIT

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux