Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J. Bruce Fields wrote:
I ran into the same confusion as the original poster when starting to
use rebase, so I suspect it's common.

I've been using rebase just about every day for close to a year and it *still* annoys me when it happens. Especially the "Did you forget to git add?" part of the message. The thought that always goes through my head is, "No, Mr. Rebase, I did NOT forget to git add. I remembered to git add, then you were too stupid to do the right thing after that."

Just happened to me this morning, in fact: I had a quick hack in place to work around a bug, the bug got fixed for real, and I rebased. In the process of conflict resolution I saw that my workaround wasn't needed any more and accepted the upstream version of that particular part of the file. Ran git-add on it, then rebase --continue, and boom, was accused of forgetting to run git-add.

It is a minor annoyance and nowadays I just sigh a bit and run --skip instead, but it'd be nice if it didn't happen. I don't like having to care whether or not I happened to change other files in a particular commit after I resolve conflicts in one file in favor of the upstream version.

-Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux