Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > [1. text/plain] > The t1300 test suite exercises the git-config(1) tool. To do so we > overwrite ".git/config" to contain custom contents. While this is easy > enough to do, it may create problems when using a non-default repository > format because we also overwrite the repository format version as well > as any potential extensions. With the upcoming "reftable" ref backend > the result is that we may try to access refs via the "files" backend > even though the repository has been initialized with the "reftable" > backend. > > Refactor tests which access the refdb to be more robust by using their > own separate repositories, which allows us to be more careful and not > discard required extensions. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> > --- > @@ -2009,11 +2020,11 @@ test_expect_success '--show-origin getting a single key' ' > ' > > test_expect_success 'set up custom config file' ' > - CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILE="custom.conf" && > - cat >"$CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILE" <<-\EOF > + cat >"custom.conf" <<-\EOF && > [user] > custom = true > EOF > + CUSTOM_CONFIG_FILE="$(test-tool path-utils real_path > custom.conf)" > ' >From the commit message it was not clear to me this change was needed. Do you think it's worth it to add something to the commit message explaining you now need to copy the custom.conf into each seperate repository? -- Toon
