Re: [GSoC][RFC] Replace use of atoi() with strtol_i(), as a microproject

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> A corrupt patch may be getting a nonsense patch-ID with the current
> code and hopefully is not matching other patches that are not
> corrupt, but with such a change, a corrupt patch may not be getting
> any patch-ID and a loop that computes patch-ID for many files and
> try to match them up might need to be rewritten to take the new
> failure case into account.

Are you talking about the loop in `get_one_patchid()`? And how should
the failure case be handled? Should it give a warning or an error?





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux