Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2024, #01; Tue, 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> OK, everything seems fine thus far, until we inspect the value of
> g->bloom_filter_settings, which is NULL, becuase of this hunk from
> commit-graph.c::graph_read_bloom_data():
>
>     if (hash_version != 1)
>       return 0;
>
> which terminates the function before we assign g->bloom_filter_settings
> for the existing (written with v2 Bloom filters) graph layer.
>
> I don't think that there is a way to fix this in a backwards compatible
> way, but I'm comfortable with that in this instance since we don't
> expect users to upgrading to v2 Bloom filters and then writing new graph
> layers using a non-v2 compatible version of Git.

A big red button solution to avoid this would be to uprev the
repository format version once you start writing v2 Bloom filters
anywhere in the layers.  That way, existing Git clients would not be
able to touch it.  I do not know if the cure is more severe than the
disease in that case, though.

In any case, at least, we should be able to prepare the code that we
teach to grok v2 today so that they do not trigger the same segfault
when they see a commit graph layer containing v3 Bloom filters (or
later).  Then we won't have to have the same conversation when we
somehow need to update Bloom filters again.







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux